Global companies are taken from the state of the traditional functions. This ideological and social benefits, and priorities for technological development. Nowadays, more and more global companies are for their employees is more important than the native state. Many people write about the destruction of the concept of nation-state. In this light, frequently mentioned by multinational companies that are advocates of nation-states are called even the "enemies of humanity." What is so terrible in them? As multinational companies can affect the state? Let's face it. First, some statistics.
In 2003, a ranking of the largest economies in the world less part is occupied by the state. 49 countries against 51 multinational companies (hereinafter referred to as TNCs). During the crisis, many TNCs have lost ground in a hundred of the richest, but such superficial judgments deceptive. If we take calculation of 150 largest economies in the world, this list will have 59% of the TNCs. Companies such as Royal Dutch Shell and ExxonMobil are richer than Poland, Sweden, United Arab Emirates and Finland. At Wal-Mart's running more than 2 million people, more than the population of a country like Qatar.
The policies pursued by most of the developed or developing economies, is to reduce government intervention in the economy and the business of large companies. Thus, large TNCs are now supranational institutions. Throughout history, various forms of association succeeded each other. This community and the policies, then nation-states, then national. Each new form has been effective in previous politically and economically.
Comments Area
Sorry! This article is unable to leave response!