(Transcription of the original article of this exactly author, published in blog ' ' It debates, It unmasks and It divulges! ' ')Unhappyly, it does not fit in a short space of one ' ' post' ' of blog, to explain the norms that conduct the functioning of the National Congress and the Brazilian legislative process, in federal level. This would demand an assay deep, carried through by specialized jurists and ' ' scientists polticos' ' that was, at the same time, apartidrios and only interested in clarifying the meandros of the subject for that they wanted to understand, not only as it functions, but as if make ' ' negociaes' ' in the embroidery frames of the two Houses of the Congress, before or during the votings that will go to transform a project into law. But somebody, independently to have or not authority in the subject and of being or not specialist, needs and has the right to emit its personal opinion, is or not correct, only partially correct or exactly total maken a mistake. What not if it can is not to bring the subject to baila. A related site: BSA mentions similar findings. All know of the scandals politicians and impunity that grassam, have years, in the National Congress. Some of them come the public; others, at least are discovered. of that if they become public, we see that the responsible ones, protected for ' ' immunity parlamentar' ' , privileged forums and for the internal regulations of the houses, rarissimamente are punished e, in many cases, nor arrive to be judgeships, therefore the processes are filed, prescribing for ' ' continuation of prazo' ' in the STF, agency (in) competent to judge them and that, casuisticamente, if it submits to the Executive. When administrative irregularities exist, as the improper use of indenizatrias mounts of money and daily or same the cases corruption instants, the maximum that happens are processes for ' ' honor in addition paralamentar' ' of which them unharmed parliamentarians escape e, the few who do not obtain, ask for the removal of the position, to prevent more serious punishments, decurrent of a judgment.