Tucson Miracle

' ' This distinction between proprietors and not-proprietors is the foundation of liberalism and is express with extreme lucidity for Kant' '. (op.cit P. 17) Kant attributes a superior direction to the law: he is so sacred, so inviolable, that it is crime even though to place it in quarrel. It is the regulating instrument between property and freedom, representing the sovereignty of the people, but he is above of this sovereignty. It is the typical liberal vision of the Rule of law. ' ' The sovereignty of the people must be delimited by some laws that are above of it and are inviolvis, unquestionable: the right of property, the association, meeting, expression, freedom of speech. Freedom that, in the practical one, is usufructed only by who will have resources enough to enjoy of them ' '. (they ibidem).

The CONCEPTION DE KARL HEIRINCH MARX – (1818-1883) Marx, in contrast of the liberal thought, establishes the connection enters the civil society (joint of the economic relations) and the society politics (the State), that they are presented interlaced, being an expression of the other. ' ' The society politics, the State, is expression of the civil society, that is, of the production relations that in it if instalaram' '. (they ibidem, P. 26). In the workmanship the German Ideology, Marx synthecizes the essence of its conception between the economic development, the State and the ideologies.

' ' (…) it is not the State that establishes the civil society, that absorbs in itself the civil society, as it affirmed Hegel; for the opposite, it is the civil society, understood as the set of the economic relations, that the sprouting of the State, its character, its laws explains, and thus for diante' '. (Ibidem, P. 27). When arguing the marxist conception, Gruppi makes a necessary and eloquent boarding: ' ' Escravista state guarantees the domination on the slaves, the feudal State guarantees the corporations, and the capitalist State guarantees the predominance of the capitalist relations of production, protects them, (…) guarantees the extended reproduction of the capital, the capitalist accumulation (…) ' ' (p.28).

‘ On the other hand, the truth of an express proposal a fact, in the case of the moral judgments does not have nothing that is equivalent to the affirmation of that determined one been of things ‘ ‘. A normative consensus, forming in conditions of free and universal participation in the context of a practical speech, establishes a valid norm (or it confirms its validity). ‘ validade’ of a moral norm it means that ‘ merece’ the universal recognition in virtue of its capacity of, by means of the reason only, to get the assent of the will of those to who if dirige.’ ‘ (HABERMAS 2007, P. 65-66) Good i, what we have is the proposal of a side that points with respect to the fact that ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ of the other the moral judgment that does not have the same possibility, however would fit a clarification concerning this proposal here that in one of its aspects could be abrangncia of an experience given and crystallized in a result of what ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ that is, something that infects or makes possible a relation that would characterize as a citizen its circumstance, a dualidade that clama a unit, what he is or that where the proper proposal still points or the fact and, how much to the moral judgment, that does not point with respect to what it is, however only perhaps, for what it could be, that is, the presumption or still the estimated one and we have a difficult shock considered for Habermas, reason and will here and could ask what it characterizes the reason? Or still, the reason in its affirmation is will or construction on a foundation or a structure of will? Better it would be to place, what it would constitute the reason? Would be the proposal an intrinsic characteristic of the same one, that is, the reason? The reason in its constitution is not affirmed in proposals, as if it looks at for this, however when we arrive at the validity of something we are ahead of the quandary, affirmation and negation where in accordance with this, the reason, will subordinate or to the will not having become – a recognition that perhaps can say with this word, something that it was known and that necessary to pass again for the same process of knowing, that is, to recognize is to know two times so that if directs for what it could be characterized as the fact that constitutes what perhaps it gives cohesion to the assigned person as universal.

Equally it is admitted, in the moderate ways, a socratria construction, supported for four forts pillars: Education, Philosophy, Politics and Religion. Wild Pine Blacksmith congregated in its person, the life and the workmanship, those four dimensions of the man in society. In the religious scope, the author of a indication of which is the virtues that, in the Christian religion, the man must observe: Faith, Hope and Charity, whose characterization it looks for to make in accessible language. Health organizations is often quoted as being for or against this. The interest in if approaching the religion, any that it is, inhabits in the fact of this component of the human being, at least in the majority of the people, being part of universally recognized the human rights. With effect, Pine Blacksmith defending and giving to priority to the religion catholic, implicitly recognizes, for the natural law of the freedom, other religions, of remaining portion, as Christian that it was, certainly it practised the virtues that defended and through the charity it would have the obligation of being tolerant and to develop the love to the next one. Retaking, however, other aspects from which if it looks for to demonstrate that the Social Philosophy, Educational and Politics of Wild Pine Blacksmith have interest for the Human Rights in the actualidade, for what three are written down plus these sources: First: How much to the Social Philosophy, it is verified that the concept of social rights, in this author, drift of the established one for the social or positive laws that constitute decisions taken for the men, congregated in society. Acaho may not feel the same. In this direction they point its projectos of construction of associations, of creation of banks, foundation of society of mutual socorros, establishments of industrial education. Thought and share for the resolution of the problems of the community. In the Silvestrina society all the citizens have right to the work or, in the lack of this, to the official supports for its survival, however, it is obligation of the individual to provide the ways of its subsistence, through the work, in a profession for which it has physical and moral capacity. According to D. Brooke Harlow, who has experience with these questions.

After the reading and detailed analysis of the workmanship thoughts (pensees) we develop the following topics. 1 God and the happiness. 2 God as I alliviate of the suffering. 3 human Suffering as synonymous of growth. A related site: Brooke Harlow mentions similar findings. 1 God and the Happiness. All human being searchs the happiness since the antiquity, but what it is the happiness, she would be it as the air that can be direction, but not seen, that although not to have I smell, flavor or taste we do not live without it.

All person has point or points of view in accordance with its subjectivity, what for some she can be considered significant, positive or even though happiness, for outrem can be considered disaster, as example: to eat caviar, shrimp can be excellent for many, but for that the fruits of the sea are alrgicos can mean the end of the life, therefore can falecer if ingest the food. All want the happiness, pray and make rituals for its Deuses, but what it is the happiness, if I ask for a God then it I am not I enter in the ones in the terrestrial plan, or if he is as I can identifies there clearly? It would be to have a richness, being millionaire having capital to decide any problem, but the money not purchase the life or purchase? It can be the happiness the same thing that fame, being world-wide known having I sanction and thousand of followers? Or better having much power, to be an official consumista where I full my body of nutrients of which it not it needs creating deposits fat and completing the brain with propagandas where the occult messages are true dominant signals, that influence the culture of the world-wide population. To look something, that I cannot see, but which the places certain to be explored and analyzed, and God what she has to have with happiness, therefore nor always a person desires what really she needs, therefore the body human needs food to be able to survive, but exactly with the saciada hunger some continue to eat and to eat each time more or to drink and to drink compulsory and the list can be extended infinitely, they feel lack of something and they look for to saciar all its emotional necessity and not physical it that he would be the correct one.

Therefore, to the soul through all the lessons of training with physical bodies in all the twelve signs of the zodiac, it requires a huge number of lives (births and deaths) of physical bodies. Shower, changing bodies, must pass the full range of Zodiac signs, performing their karmic goals and teaching them the ideas. After that decision, leaving the soul on earth or not. If the soul has learned all the lessons of ideas zodiac signs, it is no longer born into a physical body on Earth. She goes into those worlds, of which came from its exiled to Earth for crimes committed in these worlds. If the soul is not learned lessons of karmic zodiac, it is sent to the new training, new life physical body, a new circle of the zodiac. The soul learns from Aries to Pisces.

If the soul is not learned karmic ideas all zodiac signs, or learned their negative properties (ie not passed the exam), then it is reborn with the body in Aries and again at Zodiac is a Pisces. I shower, change the body for a long time and returned back to training on zodiac, long-lived on Earth, it can be seen in the natal chart (birth horoscope of an individual) and by (the science of hand) on the palms of both hands. The hands of men whose souls have been learning a lot of laps on the wheel of the zodiac, so many lines. The right and left hand heavily dotted with numerous lines going in different directions. The palms are covered with grid lines. This old soul. Source: What Health. The smaller lines on the palms, the younger age of the karmic soul.

People who have very few lines on the palms – karma young souls. They pass the first round of training on the zodiac wheel. Y people with a lot of lines on the palms, the Soul are so many times, were trained to circle the zodiac. But these souls can never get away from the incarnations in the physical body, to get away from Earth. They can not pass an exam on Love, Compassion, Charity, etc. after a training karmic incarnation in terms of the zodiac. Usually, people with old souls (grid lines on the palms), prone to mysticism, all the esoteric, occult and otherworldly. Sometimes they remember (part of) their past lives, especially by entering into an altered state of consciousness (trance) or meditating. Often these people see the events of his past lives in a dream. Some remember the blazing fires of the Inquisition in the Middle Ages remember that they were witches or wizards. Jews in the civil war has firm opinions on the matter. In fact, many of the magical abilities of the past lives of these people remain in the current. They can by thought or look negatively affect people in their lives and destiny. Traditionally, in believed that covered with lines of palms indicate a nervous nature of their owners – the neuroses, phobias, etc. practice the author shows that this is untrue.