National Government

Averages often obscure reality. In the case of transfers to the provinces, hide the fact that some (those who are obedient and disciplined governors) are favored to deny resources to the most unruly. While Entre Rios receives 1.6 billion for public works and the Chaco Jorge Capitanich rewarded him with 200, Cordoba is only 18 million and a half spin, while its governor, Juan Schiaretti threat to resort to court to get paid one hundred times that amount: 1,600 million pension commitments to the National Government had sworn that would work … before the agrarian conflict. For its part, Catamarca, where a radical ruling that stopped being K, Eduardo Brizuela del Moral, received approximately $ 20 million, but 100 calls from a debt that will mean the central state. And laid bare again how this law is not fulfilled, indignant really see how much money should be here today in each of the provinces and be reflected in works to improve education, health, safety, jobs, infrastructure, etc. .

Not be known with certainty where and how the government abused the little information that people have about these issues and many more. Vocabulary In this way as I am beginning to end this paper, but would not be complete without a conclusion. In the final conclusion that I’ve gotten is that the national government does not comply with either the constitution or the law 23 548. In the first place the “federal guarantee” that establishes the constitution is not met, since economic equality that should exist between the provinces there, it brings enormous differences between them and with them big problems, because having such a difference between the provinces many people in some of them migrate to other, looking for a better quality of life and comes up with the very serious population problems facing the country, where more than 25% of the population lives in one province. .


Remember now How has he reacted to a generous praise. Probably you tried to act to really deserve it. Practice the art of tolerance, understanding, generosity suits you. Think about policy. What differentiates a statesman of a single politician, is the ability to compromise and reach agreements of State, for the benefit of a nation. The statesman invites the opposition to join the both, agree and move forward on important subjects for a country.

It is impossible that a modern statesman use acidic critique and playing with his political adversary. Think about the company. Large employers are generally great leaders, people able to motivate hundreds or thousands of people, of making equipments, excite them and inspire them with their goals and win the hard battle of competition. They do not criticise, they praise, they motivate. Criticizing is a waste of time and money. They know very well that the productivity grows with motivation.

Lycos users. is. Us provides, please handle the criticism, considering the following aspects: 1. delineate the behavior that want to criticize. 2 Make your criticism as specific as possible. 3 Make sure that the behavior which criticizes might change; and if not, do not criticize him. 4 Use statements in first person, and avoid threats and accusations. 5 Make sure that the other person understands his criticism and the reason for the same. Not sputter or talk too fast. Not even the best criticism serves, if the other person does not understand what he says. 6. Do not insist too. A long and repetitive criticism induces, simply, to which the other person is turned off. Nor turn his criticisms in speeches; When the listener is bored, he does not pay attention. 7. Provide incentives for behavior change, and commit to work together to resolve the situation. 8. Do not leave your own negative feelings, stain what is saying.